WCC Assembly - Post #2
Hi ya´ll:
If you haven´t heard, the big thing happening on campus yesterday was the youth protest that happened during the last plenary of the day.
This protest, from what I saw, was mostly stewards that were protesting. What they were protesting about was the fact that 25% of the Central Committee would not be made up of youth, and they felt that that was unfair and that was silencing the youth.
I would like to go on record as saying that I did NOT support this youth protest. Why? While I do feel that while it would be nice to have 25% of the Central Cmte made up of youth, 1) it is NOT a realistic figure, and 2) it was not the place or the time to make such a protest.
Why is it not a realistic figure? Well, because the Central Cmte is made up of delegates to the WCC assembly, and there certaintly weren´t 25% of the delegates to the assembly under 30. To be a member of the Central Cmte, you have to be a delegate. So, there was not the constituency to draw from. That´s a major problem, sports fans.
Why was it not the place or the time to protest? Well, in my most humble opinion, which, at points, tends not to be humble, the place where the protests needed to happen was at the local level, when the delegates were chosen. It should have been earlier, because there was nothing that the assembly floor could have done about it.
Learn some timing and do your HOMEWORK if you´re going to do a protest. This protest was acknowledged by the moderator, and then, as I read it, immediately dismissed.
To me, this sounds like something the CFS would pull...it had about as much effect as they do, anyway.
Talk to you all soon.
Grace and Peace,
Matt
---
P.S. This blog entry, or any of the ones before it, is the opinion of the author, and not of any body connected to the Anglican Church of Canada. Just thought I´d remind you, in case you either didn´t know, or forgot.
